<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>brainpanonline.com &#187; Featured</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.brainpanonline.com/category/featured/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.brainpanonline.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2011 03:55:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Oh Good, The GOP Candidates are Still Assholes About Gay Rights</title>
		<link>http://www.brainpanonline.com/2011/06/14/oh-good-the-gop-candidates-are-still-assholes-about-gay-rights/</link>
		<comments>http://www.brainpanonline.com/2011/06/14/oh-good-the-gop-candidates-are-still-assholes-about-gay-rights/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2011 13:04:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Benjamin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DADT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PanderFest2012]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brainpanonline.com/?p=57</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Despite the many issues facing the American People, it&#8217;s heartwarming to know that the GOP candidates for president can still take time out of their schedules to hate me and all the other members of the LBGT community. Did I say heartwarming? I meant sickening. Since the bible is obviously so important to these people, I would like to know [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>Despite the many issues facing the American People, it&#8217;s heartwarming to know that the GOP candidates for president can still take time out of their schedules to hate me and all the other members of the LBGT community. Did I say heartwarming? I meant sickening.</p>
<p><iframe src="http://videos.mediaite.com/embed/player/?layout=&#038;playlist_cid=&#038;media_type=video&#038;content=MQYM420VV68Q38NG&#038;read_more=1&#038;widget_type_cid=svp" width="420" height="421" frameborder="0" marginheight="0" marginwidth="0" scrolling="no" allowtransparency="true"></iframe></p>
<p>Since the bible is obviously so important to these people, I would like to know if they support denying farm subsidies to anyone planting different crops side by side. No? This is just about the family? Fine then. Let&#8217;s see a Constitutional amendment banning marriage between straight couples who cannot biologically reproduce. They can adopt you say, and children should have one father and one mother? Okey dokey, then what about Divorce? The bible has way more to say about Divorce than it does homosexuality, and it would by definition lead to single parent households. As they have established the concept that only Leave-It-To-Beaver style two straight parent households are acceptable to them, and this is all obviously their business for some reason, then outlawing divorce would be the logical next step right? Oh. Newt has been married how many times? So I guess he wouldn&#8217;t go for that.</p>
<p>OH and of course DADT must come back. Without it, our military will be forced to wear pink, and will be easier to shoot at. Or something. Who cares if they are qualified? Gays are not Americans to these people. And Americans can&#8217;t fight in the military. We are a Christian army, after all, and the Lord would surely smite us for our diversity.</p>
<p>These people make me ill. I must now go take a silk-wood shower.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.brainpanonline.com/2011/06/14/oh-good-the-gop-candidates-are-still-assholes-about-gay-rights/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tracy Morgan, Stand-Up Comedy, and What Free Speech Means</title>
		<link>http://www.brainpanonline.com/2011/06/12/tracy-morgan-stand-up-comedy-and-what-free-speech-means/</link>
		<comments>http://www.brainpanonline.com/2011/06/12/tracy-morgan-stand-up-comedy-and-what-free-speech-means/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jun 2011 21:44:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Benjamin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Homophobic Comments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Attitudes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Standup Comedy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tracy Morgan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brainpanonline.com/?p=52</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To clear, Tracy Morgan should be ashamed of himself. He allowed his ignorance to get the better of him, and allowed it to consume his act. Beyond being a fine example of the bullshit gay people must endure on a daily basis, it is bad, amateurish comedy and speaks to a lack of craftsmanship on his part. We have enough [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>To clear, Tracy Morgan should be ashamed of himself. He allowed his ignorance to get the better of him, and allowed it to consume his act. Beyond being a fine example of the bullshit gay people must endure on a daily basis, it is bad, amateurish comedy and speaks to a lack of craftsmanship on his part. We have enough crap to deal with, without having to spend time on this sort of stupidity.</p>
<p>As a gay man in a long term same sex relationship, I follow news pertinent to my community with great interest. The LGBT community is constantly under attack, and has been for as long as there have been LGBT people. I am also a passionate and longtime fan of stand-up comedy. My childhood was filled with countless hours of watching <a title="Wikipedia: The Comedy Channel" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Comedy_Channel_(United_States)" target="_blank">The Comedy Channel</a>, the superior precursor to the modern entity known as Comedy Central. These passions intersect from time to time, almost always with embarrassing results. When straight comedians try to address gay issues, a certain lack of understanding is to be expected. Sometimes that lack of understanding is profound. Sam Kinison comes to mind. A great comedian, one I respect, but also one who managed to say some unbelievably hurtful and ignorant things about homosexuals. Even as I try to put his comments into context, allowing for the vastly different social attitudes and political climate at the time he was performing, they still manage to sting, despite my best efforts to look at them academically. And that is just one example.</p>
<p>Homophobic comments still pepper the acts of several successful stand-up comics, and in each case I make the same effort to put their comments into the proper perspective. If stand-up is in any way about truth, then the road to that truth frequently leads through questionable and tasteless areas, as it should. I try to have faith that good comedians will eventually get there, and I try to force myself to remember that for those who don&#8217;t, homophobia is the least of their problems. Comedians work their material like sculptors, painstakingly carving something out of nothing, and while sculptors have the luxury of working in private, comedians must do the ugliest of their work on stage, in front of people. I&#8217;m sure if you walked into Michelangelo&#8217;s studio and saw &#8220;David&#8221; as a work in progress, it probably wouldn&#8217;t look like much either.</p>
<p>Then again, Tracy Morgan is no Michelangelo.</p>
<p><span id="more-52"></span></p>
<p>I will not rehash his comments. They are well known, and if you have read this far, I expect you know them too. But how to judge them? They were, as has been often repeated over the last few days, said in the context of his stand-up act. I allow nearly endless forgiveness for the hard hat area that is an act-in-progress. Comics require that space to be effective. On the other hand, his comments were wildly ignorant, irresponsible and hurtful, in any context. Stand-up comedians can&#8217;t just say whatever they want without any fear of criticism. If they could, then their acts would have no meaning. The best comedy comes from line crossing, but if you choose to cross that line and are not funny once you get to the other side, then you have earned the reactions you get. The ability to walk that tightrope is part of what separates good comics from bad ones. Otherwise you are simply being a jerk-off in order to obtain a cheap laugh.</p>
<p>I expect part of the reason his comments hit so close to home for me, and many other members of my community, is that these are the precise opinions held by the worst of our tormentors. Stand-up acts are works of fiction. The problems we face are quite real, and the consequences are often life and death. We are not inclined to find his ignorant comments very funny when not provided alongside some greater insight. Maybe he hadn&#8217;t worked out the insight part yet. If not, I suggest that perhaps his gay chunk wasn&#8217;t quite ready for the stage.</p>
<p>We cannot know the true feelings Tracy Morgan has for the gay community. Unfortunately, his act is the only word we have from him on the subject. I would suggest he clear this up in some meaningful way. Or not. Whatever. Until then, I&#8217;m not feeling particularly inclined to give him much more thought. Bad comics don&#8217;t deserve much detailed consideration.</p>
<p>And to Tracy Morgan: Get better at your job, and I&#8217;ll be happy to give you another look. But seriously, bad first impression. Do better.</p>
<p>Also, a quick word about freedom of speech. This Tracy Morgan business has nothing to do with freedom of speech, which is among the most misunderstood aspects of American government. Aside from how unfortunate Mr. Morgan&#8217;s comments are, my big takeaway from reading internet comments and reactions to his deplorable rant is that people have a drastically inaccurate perception of what the notion of &#8220;Freedom of Speech&#8221; means. Tracy Morgan was not arrested by the government for his comments. If he had been, that would be a clear violation of his first amendment rights. As this did not occur, and as he has suffered no governmental sanction of any kind regarding his statements, no violation of those rights has occurred. Period. Freedom of speech does not mean freedom from criticism. It&#8217;s a little sad that we have to take time to explain that, but it&#8217;s something that every American should understand. I also find it deeply ironic that this specious &#8220;What about his freedom of speech&#8221; argument is being used to try to rebut this criticism. It truly shows the degree to which the first amendment is misinterpreted, usually by people who share Mr. Morgan&#8217;s sentiments. Agree or disagree with him regarding his content, but the question of his allegedly molested freedom of speech rights is not up for debate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.brainpanonline.com/2011/06/12/tracy-morgan-stand-up-comedy-and-what-free-speech-means/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Big HIV/AIDS News That We Should Totally Not Overreact Too</title>
		<link>http://www.brainpanonline.com/2010/12/14/big-hivaids-news-that-we-should-totally-not-overreact-too/</link>
		<comments>http://www.brainpanonline.com/2010/12/14/big-hivaids-news-that-we-should-totally-not-overreact-too/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2010 01:22:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Benjamin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HIV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Skeptical Inquiry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Take It Easy Everybody]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brainpanonline.com/?p=46</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Did you hear? THEY CURED AIDS! It&#8217;s over, everybody! Bring on the risky and unprotected sex! The worlds supply of condoms will now have to be repurposed and used for candle snifters, or tiny handbags. The world is saved! Brilliant German scientists have brought an end to the world wide plague that is HIV! Except they didn&#8217;t. Here is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>Did you hear? THEY CURED AIDS!</p>
<p>It&#8217;s over, everybody! Bring on the risky and unprotected sex! The worlds supply of condoms will now have to be repurposed and used for candle snifters, or tiny handbags. The world is saved! Brilliant German scientists have brought an end to the world wide plague that is HIV!</p>
<p>Except they didn&#8217;t.</p>
<p>Here is the story via <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/40666443/ns/health-aids/" target="_blank">MSNBC</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>In 2007, the man received a bone marrow transplant to treat his leukemia. The transplant — which treats leukemia by essentially rebooting the <a href="http://www.myhealthnewsdaily.com/hiv-stem-cell-transplant-cure-101214-0879/#">body&#8217;s</a> <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/40666443/ns/health-aids/#" target="_blank">immune system</a> and creating new white blood cells —also had the benefit of wiping out the HIV infection. Now, three and a half years later, the patient remains HIV-free, which suggests he is cured of the disease, the researchers said.</p></blockquote>
<p>OK. We have to be really careful here. One of the things that I am annoyingly earnest about is science education, and skeptical inquiry. I feel like an appreciation for the scientific method, and a firm and critical eye for what is and isn&#8217;t true are the most important tools you can have at your disposal when trying to make sense of the world. Part of this is being comfortable with not having clear answers. Science is very, very slow. Things are often not clearly known, and even less understood. The bar is much higher in the scientific community for what is and is not fact. Tests must be done, and then redone. Experiments must provide reliable, quantifiable results, over and over again, and must be throughly peer reviewed. Then again, results are in and of themselves substantial, and when something works, that&#8217;s hard to argue with. But we have to be careful using words like &#8220;cure&#8221;.</p>
<p>The article goes on to point this out:</p>
<blockquote><p>So exactly why the patient doesn’t have any detectable HIV in his body <a href="http://www.myhealthnewsdaily.com/top-10-mysterious-diseases-0230/">remains a mystery</a>. It&#8217;s possible that through the entire course of <a href="http://www.myhealthnewsdaily.com/hiv-stem-cell-transplant-cure-101214-0879/#">treatment</a>, both types of HIV were eliminated from the body, Zack said.</p>
<p>However, &#8220;We don’t know if it would always happen, or whether there&#8217;s still some of that <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/40666443/ns/health-aids/#" target="_blank">virus</a> somewhere in the body that hasn&#8217;t been sampled,&#8221; Zack said.</p>
<p>Ultimately, the results would need to be reproduced before researchers could know whether this was an  option for treating HIV, Zack said. And, practically, finding donors would be a challenge — only one percent of Northern Europeans are known to have this particular mutation, Zack said.</p></blockquote>
<p>What we have here is information. A specific set of circumstances produced a specific result in one documented case. It is, to be sure, a great big piece of information, but it is not proof of any effective method all by its encouraging little self. Information is always good. But, the only thing information gives us is the need for more information.</p>
<p>This is good news though. But let&#8217;s keep it together out there, OK?</p>
<p>Oh, and this guy had Leukemia, and HIV? Damn. That sucks. But he got cured of both. This guy&#8217;s life is bipolar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.brainpanonline.com/2010/12/14/big-hivaids-news-that-we-should-totally-not-overreact-too/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Senators Get One More Chance To Blow DADT Repeal</title>
		<link>http://www.brainpanonline.com/2010/12/12/senators-get-one-more-chance-to-blow-dadt-repeal/</link>
		<comments>http://www.brainpanonline.com/2010/12/12/senators-get-one-more-chance-to-blow-dadt-repeal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Dec 2010 02:18:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Benjamin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Don't Ask Don't Tell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brainpanonline.com/?p=39</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Who knew that Don&#8217;t Ask Don&#8217;t Tell repeal would find it&#8217;s tireless champion in Joseph Lieberman? True to his word, he and Susan Collins have indeed introduced a stand alone bill to repeal Don&#8217;t Ask Don&#8217;t Tell. The Hill has a nice overview of what is going down: At this point the standalone repeal bill [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>Who knew that Don&#8217;t Ask Don&#8217;t Tell repeal would find it&#8217;s tireless champion in Joseph Lieberman? True to his word, he and Susan Collins have indeed introduced a stand alone bill to repeal Don&#8217;t Ask Don&#8217;t Tell.</p>
<p><a href="http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/133245-senate-backers-launch-last-ditch-dont-ask-repeal-effort">The Hill</a> has a nice overview of what is going down:</p>
<blockquote><p>At this point the standalone repeal bill is a last-ditch effort. The strategy has the backing of Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.), Senate Armed Services Committee Chairman Carl Levin (D-Mich.) and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), who is on standby to facilitate a successful vote in the House. Pelosi is part of the negotiations with the Senate to try to figure out the best and easiest way to pass repeal in the face of Republican opposition and a very crowded last week in session.</p></blockquote>
<p>So this isn&#8217;t looking good. It goes on to lay out the intense logistical battle involved with actually getting this to where an actual vote could happen, and the process seems daunting to say the least.</p>
<p>And why is this so hard? Let me bring you some of the more charming entries from the comment section associated with the post:</p>
<blockquote><p>The economy is in the tank, unemployment will be over 10% by January, and all the U.S. Congress is doing is concerning itself with making gay people happy. You can&#8217;t make this stuff up!</p>
<p>BY BALONEY GUY</p></blockquote>
<p>Or how about this one:</p>
<blockquote><p>Let us pray that our nation is spared this shame.</p>
<p>BY GEORGE</p></blockquote>
<p>Or this delightful bit of nastiness:</p>
<blockquote><p>I want the Army contract to supply stain remover to all the bases. There will be some serious crap stains to remove from sheets and cargo pants… big $</p>
<p>BY BUSHY</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/133245-senate-backers-launch-last-ditch-dont-ask-repeal-effort"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-40" title="LIEBERMANCOLLINS" src="http://www.brainpanonline.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/LIEBERMANCOLLINS-300x219.gif" alt="" width="300" height="219" /></a>Awesome. As a gay person, these types of things are always alarming to read. But you can look in the comment section of any article regarding gay rights, and read basically the same types of things. In the opinion of these thoughtful posters, not only should gay people stop complaining about such trival matters as our civil rights, but we are also shameful, and will endanger the cleanliness of our nation&#8217;s linens with our sinful behavior at the slightest provocation.  And these types of messages are tame. The comments can become downright vile.</p>
<p>Regardless, the Don&#8217;t Ask Don&#8217;t Tell issue is a no-brainer, politically. It enjoys wide public support, and repeal is now the official recommendation of the military. The public is coming to accept the reality that gay people exist, and that it&#8217;s no big deal, and that demonizing us, and depriving us of our rights is probably not the right thing to do. In short, the public has become bored with this, and is ready to let this issue go.</p>
<p>This, I think, is the primary motivation for the current resistance. The prospect that it may become no longer acceptable to publicly hate gay people is a terrifying thought to many people, and that sort of fear breeds a very nasty brand of hate.</p>
<p>For example. When you hear people say that they don&#8217;t want homosexuality taught in schools, what they are really saying is &#8220;We don&#8217;t want our children to think that being gay is OK&#8221;, and when you hear opponents of DADT contrive one reason after another for why they oppose homosexual acceptance in the military, I feel like they are essentially trying to say the same thing. The argument comes down to &#8220;If we let them do respectable things like be in the military, then it will be so much harder to alienate them and say nasty things about them in public.&#8221; And it will. The future is breathing down the necks of those who have dedicated themselves to anti-homosexual bigotry, and they aren&#8217;t taking it very well.</p>
<p>And so it comes down to Joe Lieberman, and the ability of the congress to get it&#8217;s job done. An encouraging thought indeed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.brainpanonline.com/2010/12/12/senators-get-one-more-chance-to-blow-dadt-repeal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Internet is Forever</title>
		<link>http://www.brainpanonline.com/2010/12/12/the-internet-is-forever/</link>
		<comments>http://www.brainpanonline.com/2010/12/12/the-internet-is-forever/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Dec 2010 20:54:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Benjamin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Random Thoughts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brain Pan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Old Sins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Snapshots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Way Back Machine]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brainpanonline.com/?p=35</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This week marks the relaunch of brainpanonline.com. Brain Pan has been around in some limping form or another since 2004. I have always been a writer, without any real place to write anything, and Brain Pan was an attempt to solve that problem. Over time, it also became a way for me to work on [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>This week marks the relaunch of brainpanonline.com. Brain Pan has been around in some limping form or another since 2004. I have always been a writer, without any real place to write anything, and Brain Pan was an attempt to solve that problem. Over time, it also became a way for me to work on my Web Development skills, a pursuit that eventually evolved into how I make my living. It also was part of the beginning of <a href="http://fatrobotradio.com" target="_blank">Fat Robot Radio</a>, and everything that came of that. Even though this site as been up till now a sorry and pathetic mess, it was part of reason why my world looks the way it does today. It is embarrassing to think back to how bad the site was back when I started. And I assumed that what with the fliud and ever changing nature of the internet, these old sins would have been long wiped away.</p>
<p>But I forgot: But the internet is forever.</p>
<p><a href="http://brainpan.blogdrive.com/"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-36" title="brainpanoldsite" src="http://www.brainpanonline.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/brainpanoldsite-300x169.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="169" /></a> Thanks to the Way Back Machine, I was able to uncover that first site.  Before I bought the domain brainpanonline.com, I ran the site for almost a year using free web hosting. I assumed that sites like this went back through and deleted old, inactive accounts, but this one apparently does not. No, readers, it is out there, just as I left it over 5 years ago.</p>
<p>This is fascinating to me. Our culture is leaving behind unintentional traces of itself in the dead parts of the web. Old profiles on dead social media sites, comments in long dead blogs, images uploaded to god knows where and left abandoned; all these things are still out there. They exist as weird little snapshots of where we were at a given time. And they will be out there, of interest to no one, telling the world about who we used to be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.brainpanonline.com/2010/12/12/the-internet-is-forever/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>America Ends It&#8217;s Non-Existent Love Affair With David Hasselhoff</title>
		<link>http://www.brainpanonline.com/2010/12/12/america-ends-its-non-existent-love-affair-with-david-hasselhoff/</link>
		<comments>http://www.brainpanonline.com/2010/12/12/america-ends-its-non-existent-love-affair-with-david-hasselhoff/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Dec 2010 19:25:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Benjamin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Baywatch Star]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Hasselhoff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ups And Downs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brainpanonline.com/?p=26</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And just like that, after just two episodes, &#8220;The Hasselhoffs&#8221; has bee canceled.  From The Wrap: &#8230;it premiered Sunday to 718,000 viewers, the series appeared short for this world. Rumors of impending cancellation gained further steam after the audience shrank for the second episode to 505,000 viewers. &#8220;The Hasselhoffs&#8221; focused on the former &#8220;Baywatch&#8221; star and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>And just like that, after just two episodes, &#8220;The Hasselhoffs&#8221; has bee canceled.  From <a href="http://www.thewrap.com/television/column-post/after-2-episodes-ae-yanks-hasselhoffs-23162" target="_blank">The Wrap</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8230;it premiered Sunday to 718,000 viewers, the series appeared short for this world. Rumors of impending cancellation gained further steam after the audience shrank for the second episode to 505,000 viewers.</p>
<p>&#8220;The Hasselhoffs&#8221; focused on the former &#8220;Baywatch&#8221; star and his daughters as they tried to break into show</p></blockquote>
<p>Wow. Even for cable that&#8217;s low.</p>
<p>Who I feel bad for are these &#8220;daughters&#8221;. Now I never watched the show, but at least one of these girls had to be expecting that the future was holding some Snooki-Level fame. So unless somebody has a sex tape chambered, it looks like Pop Culture has give David Hasselhoff and his clan a hearty vote of &#8220;No Confidence&#8221;.</p>
<p>And why, you ask, has your humble host chosen to discuss the ups and downs of David Hasselhoff&#8217;s stupid reality show? Because it serves as a bold test of my theory that no one has every truly given a shit about this man&#8217;s personal life, and that the entire thing is figment of TMZ&#8217;s imagination.</p>
<p>Then again, I reported it. So go figure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.brainpanonline.com/2010/12/12/america-ends-its-non-existent-love-affair-with-david-hasselhoff/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Doctor Who</title>
		<link>http://www.brainpanonline.com/2010/12/11/doctor-who/</link>
		<comments>http://www.brainpanonline.com/2010/12/11/doctor-who/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Dec 2010 19:12:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Benjamin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Check This Out]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stuff I Like]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bad Ass]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Doctor Who]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brainpanonline.com/?p=14</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How bad ass is Doctor Who? Seriously. If you need something to do, and aren&#8217;t afraid to become obsessed with what is clearly the best show on television, then you can find the first 5 seasons streaming on Netflix. Go watch it. Now. Also, if you haven&#8217;t seen it, here is the trailer for the upcoming Christmas special. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>How bad ass is Doctor Who? Seriously. If you need something to do, and aren&#8217;t afraid to become obsessed with what is clearly the best show on television, then you can find the first 5 seasons streaming on Netflix. Go watch it. Now.</p>
<p>Also, if you haven&#8217;t seen it, here is the trailer for the upcoming Christmas special.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qWT0PE9Yr3g"><span class="youtube">
<object width="480" height="385">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/qWT0PE9Yr3g?color1=&amp;color2=&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showsearch=0&amp;rel=0" />
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" />
<param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always">
<embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/qWT0PE9Yr3g?color1=&amp;color2=&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showsearch=0&amp;rel=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" width="480" height="385"></embed>
</object>
</span></a></p>
<p>I&#8217;m looking so forward to this it is a little sad. But only a little.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.brainpanonline.com/2010/12/11/doctor-who/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

